Chinatown, NYC
Summer 2025 – date, time, & venue TBD
Luddites are often disparaged in the modern vernacular, as many assume they were afraid of technology, or averse to change.
The truth is more nuanced– the Luddites were skillful weavers who rose up against a class of factory owners who adopted automated knitting frames operated by low-paid, less-skilled workers. Luddites were not anti-machine; many incorporated machines in their work.
Rather, they targeted wide knitting frames ("gig mills") used to produce lower-quality goods with unskilled labor, and spared machines use in "fair shops" (places which paid decent wages and respected labor norms). They would generally warn factory owners of their intentions, and ofter them a chance to remediate their practices, before destroying the gig mills. They drew their name from Ned Ludd, a mythical English weaver said to have destroyed a knitting frame in a fit of rage—whether an act of labor resistance or just a particularly bad day, we'll never know.
The principal fight of the Luddites was against the use of technology to undermine the wages and working conditions of their class and those less skilled than them. They were defenders of their livelihoods, culture, and craft. And they were labor advocates, concerned about the societal externalities created by automation in the face of exploitative industrial capitalism.
The impetus for the creation of the Ned Ludd Society for Technological Imagination is anchored in a few founding principles:
Related reading:
A Nod to Ned Ludd (The Baffler)
Rethinking the Luddites in the Age of A.I. (The New Yorker)
The AI jobs crisis is here, now (Substack)